11 Missed Trigger-Sale Opportunities: Causes + Fixes

What causes missed opportunities in trigger-based sales prospecting software? The most common causes fall into five categories: data quality failures (incomplete or inaccurate trigger data), timing gaps (signals detected too late or acted on too slowly), scoring and qualification breakdowns (wrong triggers prioritized), alert and routing failures (the right rep never sees the trigger), and CRM integration issues (triggers that enter the system but never reach a workflow). When any one of these breaks, revenue moments pass unnoticed.

Trigger-based sales prospecting software promises to surface real-time buying windows — a new executive hire, a funding round, a technology adoption, a competitor evaluation — so reps can engage prospects at the exact moment they're most receptive. But the gap between that promise and reality is where pipeline goes to die. Industry estimates suggest that B2B sales teams miss 60-80% of actionable trigger events due to a combination of data, process, and technology failures.

This diagnostic listicle identifies the 11 most common causes of missed trigger-sale opportunities, explains why each one happens, and provides concrete fixes you can implement immediately. Whether you're an SDR leader wondering why your trigger-based outreach isn't converting, or a RevOps team debugging a prospecting workflow that should be working but isn't, these 11 failure points are where to look first.

---

1. Incomplete Trigger Data Coverage Leaves Revenue Moments Invisible

The Cause

Your trigger-based sales prospecting software can only alert you to events it can see. Most trigger data providers specialize in a narrow slice of the signal landscape — one covers job changes, another tracks funding rounds, a third monitors technographic shifts. But none of them covers everything.

The missed opportunities aren't in the signals you receive — they're in the signals you don't. A prospect's company files a Form D with the SEC (early-stage fundraising signal), but your tooling only monitors Crunchbase for announced rounds. A key contact starts posting on GitHub about evaluating your product category, but your triggers are limited to LinkedIn and Twitter. A company wins a $10M federal contract that would fund your solution, but federal procurement data isn't in your trigger stack.

These invisible trigger events are the most insidious cause of missed opportunities because you can't measure what you can't see. Your conversion metrics look reasonable on the triggers you do detect — you just don't know about the 3x more triggers that never made it to your system.

The Fix

Expand your trigger coverage systematically. Start by mapping the full landscape of signals relevant to your sales motion, then compare against what your current tooling covers.

A comprehensive trigger landscape for B2B sales includes:

• People signals: Job changes, promotions, new hires, departures, social activity
• Financial signals: Funding rounds, SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, Form D), earnings transcripts, revenue changes
• Hiring signals: Job postings, hiring velocity, role-specific hiring surges
• Technology signals: Tool adoption, stack changes, technology evaluations
• Market signals: News mentions, product launches, partnerships, acquisitions
• Competitive signals: G2/Capterra evaluations, review activity, competitive content engagement
• Digital signals: Website traffic changes, SEO shifts, content publishing patterns
• Community signals: Reddit, HackerNews, ProductHunt, GitHub, podcast appearances

Autobound's signal platform covers this full spectrum with 35+ sources and 32 signal categories — including categories like SEC filings, federal contracts, GitHub activity, and podcast mentions that most trigger tools miss entirely. With 700+ signal subtypes across 50M+ companies, coverage gaps shrink dramatically.

Action step: List five deals you closed last year. For each, identify every trigger event that preceded the deal (including ones you only learned about after the fact). How many of those triggers were actually captured by your current software?

---

2. Signal Latency Means Triggers Arrive After the Window Closes

The Cause

Trigger-based selling is fundamentally about timing. A new VP of Sales is most receptive to vendor outreach in their first 30-60 days. A funding round creates an aggressive spending window for 60-90 days. A competitor evaluation on G2 might last two weeks.

But most trigger-based sales prospecting software introduces latency at every stage:

• Detection latency: 1-7 days between the event and the provider detecting it
• Delivery latency: Hours to days between detection and delivery to your system
• Enrichment latency: 1-3 days for your system to enrich the trigger with account context
• Routing latency: Hours to days for the trigger to reach the assigned rep
• Action latency: 1-5 days before the rep actually acts on the trigger

Stacked together, total latency from event to outreach can exceed two weeks — and for many trigger types, that's too late. The prospect has already spoken to competitors, made a shortlist, or moved past the initial evaluation window.

The Fix

Attack latency at every stage:

1. Choose providers with real-time or daily delivery — weekly batch delivery is a competitive disadvantage in trigger-based selling
2. Pre-enrich trigger data — use a signal platform that delivers enriched signals, not raw events that need additional processing
3. Automate routing — signals should hit the assigned rep's queue within minutes of arrival, not sit in an ops workflow
4. Set SLAs for rep response — high-priority triggers (job changes, competitor evaluations) get same-day response commitments
5. Measure and publish latency — track end-to-end latency weekly and treat it as a core operational metric

The Autobound Signal API delivers signals via REST with full metadata, enabling automated ingestion without manual enrichment cycles. Combined with CRM automation that routes signals to reps instantly, you can compress the event-to-outreach window from weeks to hours.

Action step: Measure your current end-to-end trigger latency. Pick one trigger type and build a "fast lane" workflow that bypasses batch processing. A/B test same-day outreach against your normal cadence.

---

3. Trigger Scoring Doesn't Reflect Actual Purchase Probability

The Cause

Not all triggers are equally predictive of purchase intent. But most trigger-based sales prospecting software treats them that way — either by assigning flat scores to all triggers or by using opaque "intent scores" from providers that don't correlate well with your specific buying patterns.

A CMO joining a company in your target vertical is a fundamentally different signal than a generic employee liking a LinkedIn post about your product category. But if both generate the same alert in your system, reps waste time on low-quality triggers while high-value ones sit in the same undifferentiated queue.

The scoring problem is compounded by lack of historical analysis. Most teams have never measured which specific trigger types actually convert to meetings and pipeline in their sales motion. They rely on intuition ("job changes must be good") or provider marketing ("our intent scores are 3x more predictive") instead of their own data.

The Fix

Build a trigger scoring model based on your historical conversion data:

Step 1: Tag historical deals with trigger types Go back through your last 6-12 months of closed-won deals. For each, identify which trigger events preceded the first meaningful touchpoint. Categorize them.

Step 2: Calculate trigger-type conversion rates For each trigger type, calculate:

• Trigger-to-meeting rate: Of all triggers of this type surfaced to reps, what percentage led to a booked meeting?
• Trigger-to-pipeline rate: Of those meetings, what percentage created an opportunity?
• Average deal size: Are certain trigger types associated with larger deals?

Step 3: Weight triggers accordingly Assign each trigger type a score proportional to its historical conversion rate and deal size potential. Example:

Step 4: Layer recency and seniority multipliers Apply decay functions (newer = higher weight) and seniority multipliers (VP+ = higher weight) on top of base scores.

Step 5: Recalibrate quarterly Your conversion patterns will shift as your market, product, and ICP evolve. Quarterly recalibration keeps your scoring model aligned with reality.

Action step: Start with Step 1 — tag your last 20 closed-won deals with the trigger events that preceded them. Even this small sample will reveal which trigger types drive your pipeline.

---

4. Alert Fatigue Causes Reps to Ignore Trigger Notifications

The Cause

When everything is an alert, nothing is an alert. This is the most predictable failure mode of trigger-based sales prospecting software — and the most damaging.

The typical progression:

1. System goes live. Reps receive 10-20 trigger alerts per day. Exciting! They work every one.
2. Month two. Volume increases to 40-60 alerts per day as more trigger sources are added. Reps start skimming.
3. Month three. Reps receive 80+ alerts. They stop looking at the dashboard entirely. Alerts go to email and get auto-archived.
4. Month four. Management wonders why the trigger data investment isn't generating pipeline. Reps shrug.

Alert fatigue is not a rep discipline problem — it's a system design problem. When your prospecting workflow automation sends too many signals without adequate filtering, the entire system collapses under its own volume.

The Fix

Implement a tiered alert system that matches alert urgency to trigger quality:

Tier 1: Immediate Alert (max 3-5 per rep per day)

• Criteria: Score > 80, decision-maker involvement, same-day recency
• Delivery: Push notification (Slack, mobile), CRM task with "urgent" flag
• SLA: Outreach within 4 hours

Tier 2: Daily Digest (max 10-15 per rep per day)

• Criteria: Score 40-80, relevant signal types, within 7-day recency
• Delivery: Morning email digest with prioritized list
• SLA: Outreach within 48 hours

Tier 3: Weekly Review (unlimited volume)

• Criteria: Score < 40, older signals, lower-priority trigger types
• Delivery: Weekly report in CRM dashboard
• SLA: Review during weekly planning session

This structure ensures that high-value triggers cut through the noise while lower-priority signals are available without overwhelming daily workflows.

Action step: Count how many trigger alerts your average rep receives per day. If it's more than 20, you need filtering and tiering immediately.

---

5. Poor Entity Resolution Matches Triggers to Wrong Accounts

The Cause

Entity resolution — the process of matching a trigger event to the correct company and contact in your CRM — is one of the hardest problems in data quality and timing. And it's where trigger-based sales prospecting software silently fails.

Common entity resolution failures:

• Parent-subsidiary confusion: A trigger about "Acme Corp" matches to the 50-person subsidiary instead of the 5,000-person parent company (or vice versa)
• Name disambiguation: "Mercury" could be Mercury Financial, Mercury Insurance, Mercury Systems, or Project Mercury at another company
• Domain mismatches: The trigger fires for activity on a domain that maps to the wrong entity in your CRM
• Contact matching: A job change signal for "Sarah Chen" matches to the wrong Sarah Chen in your database
• Stale CRM data: The trigger is accurate, but your CRM record for that account is outdated — wrong industry, wrong employee count, wrong contacts

When triggers match to wrong accounts, reps either waste time on the wrong prospect or, worse, make outreach that reveals they don't know who they're talking to. Both outcomes erode trust in the trigger system.

The Fix

Implement multi-factor entity resolution and regular CRM hygiene:

1. Multi-signal matching: Don't rely on a single field (company name or domain) for matching. Use a combination of domain, name, location, industry, and employee count to score match confidence
2. Confidence thresholds: Only route triggers with match confidence above 90%. Flag lower-confidence matches for manual review
3. CRM enrichment cadence: Refresh account data quarterly using firmographic providers to prevent stale-record matching
4. Deduplication: Regularly merge duplicate CRM records that create routing confusion
5. Feedback mechanism: When reps flag a wrong-account match, feed it back to improve matching rules

Using a signal provider with robust entity resolution — like Autobound, which maintains coverage across 50M+ companies with consistent entity mapping — reduces matching errors at the source rather than forcing you to fix them downstream.

Action step: Pull your last 100 trigger-sourced outreach attempts. How many went to the right account and contact? If accuracy is below 90%, your entity resolution needs work.

---

6. CRM Integration Issues Block Triggers from Reaching Workflows

The Cause

CRM integration issues are the silent killer of trigger-based prospecting. The data flows in — you can see it in your trigger platform's dashboard — but it doesn't make it to the places where reps actually work. Common CRM integration failures:

• Field mapping breaks: A platform update changes field names, breaking the integration silently
• Sync delays: Real-time triggers get batch-synced to CRM on a 4-hour cadence, losing urgency
• Permission issues: The integration user lacks permission to create tasks or update records in certain object types
• Record locking: Another automation locks the record during a sync window, causing the trigger write to fail
• Custom object limitations: Triggers are stored in a custom object that isn't visible in standard list views or reports

These issues are insidious because they don't generate error messages — the data just doesn't appear where it should. Weeks can pass before anyone notices that triggers stopped flowing.

The Fix

1. Monitor integration health daily: Build a simple dashboard that shows trigger volume by day. Any day with zero triggers should fire an alert to RevOps
2. Test the full path weekly: Every Monday, manually create a test trigger and verify it flows through enrichment, scoring, routing, CRM creation, and rep notification
3. Use native integrations where possible: Custom API integrations break more often than native connectors
4. Build redundancy: If the CRM integration fails, triggers should still reach reps via an alternative channel (Slack, email)
5. Log everything: Every trigger that enters your system should have a traceable path — when it was received, when it was scored, when it was routed, when it was delivered to CRM, and when the CRM task was created

Action step: Check your trigger volume for the last 30 days. Any gaps? Any sudden drops? If you don't have monitoring in place, build it today.

---

7. Trigger Events Don't Map to Your Sales Motion

The Cause

This is a strategic failure rather than a technical one. Your trigger-based sales prospecting software might be working perfectly — detecting events accurately, delivering them quickly, routing them cleanly — but the triggers you're monitoring don't actually correlate with purchase behavior for your product.

A company selling a $500K enterprise platform cares about executive changes, strategic initiatives, and budget cycles. A company selling a $5K/month SaaS tool cares about team growth, technology adoption, and competitor churn. Using the same trigger set for both motions will miss opportunities for both.

Common misalignment patterns:

• Monitoring generic intent when you need specific triggers: "Cloud computing interest" doesn't help if you sell a specific observability tool
• Over-indexing on financial triggers for PLG products: Funding rounds matter less when your product is adopted bottom-up
• Ignoring industry-specific triggers: Healthcare companies respond to regulatory changes. Manufacturing companies respond to supply-chain events. Generic trigger sets miss these entirely
• Tracking company-level triggers for contact-level sales: If your sale depends on reaching a specific persona, company-level triggers (funding, news) are less actionable than person-level triggers (job change, LinkedIn activity)

The Fix

Map triggers to your sales motion through a structured alignment exercise:

Step 1: Define your top three sales plays (e.g., "new leader displacement," "growth-stage expansion," "competitive replacement")

Step 2: For each play, identify the trigger events that indicate a prospect is in-window:

Step 3: Verify your current trigger software covers these events. For any gaps, evaluate providers that cover the missing categories.

With Autobound's 32 signal categories and 700+ subtypes, you can build trigger sets tailored precisely to your sales motion — from SEC filings for enterprise strategic selling to hiring signals for growth-stage targeting to GitHub activity for developer-tool companies.

Action step: Run the alignment exercise above. If more than 30% of your current triggers don't map to a defined sales play, you're wasting coverage on irrelevant events.

---

8. No Workflow Automation Between Trigger Detection and Rep Action

The Cause

The most common architecture for trigger-based sales prospecting: the software detects a trigger, creates a record somewhere, and then... waits for a human to find it and do something.

This "detect and park" pattern fails because it depends on reps proactively checking for new triggers — which means it competes with every other task on their plate. When triggers are parked in a dashboard, a custom CRM view, or a daily email, they're competing for attention with follow-up calls, internal meetings, admin tasks, and the 50 other things that fill an SDR's day.

Without prospecting workflow automation that bridges the gap between detection and action, trigger data becomes a passive resource instead of an active driver.

The Fix

Build automated workflows that eliminate human-dependent steps between trigger detection and initial outreach:

Automation Level 1: Task Creation + Routing

• Trigger detected → CRM task created → Assigned to account owner → Due date set based on trigger type urgency
• Minimum viable automation; eliminates the "check the dashboard" dependency

Automation Level 2: Sequence Enrollment

• Trigger detected → Contact identified → Auto-enrolled in pre-built outreach sequence (Outreach, Salesloft, etc.)
• Personalization tokens populated from trigger metadata
• Rep reviews and approves sequence (not starting from scratch)

Automation Level 3: AI-Assisted Draft + One-Click Send

• Trigger detected → AI generates personalized email draft using trigger context → Rep reviews, edits, and sends
• Combines AI SDR capabilities with trigger intelligence for maximum speed and personalization

Automation Level 4: Full Autonomous Outreach (with guardrails)

• Trigger detected → AI-generated, persona-matched email sent automatically for Tier 3 triggers
• Human review required for Tier 1 and Tier 2 triggers
• Performance monitoring and automatic pause if response rates drop below threshold

Most teams should start at Level 1 and progress to Level 2 within the first quarter. Levels 3 and 4 require mature data quality and scoring before they're safe to deploy.

Action step: For each trigger type in your system, document what happens between detection and first outreach. Count the human-dependent steps. Automate at least one per trigger type this quarter.

---

9. Trigger Data Quality Degrades Silently Over Time

The Cause

Data quality and timing are inseparable in trigger-based selling. A trigger that was accurate three months ago might be stale, a provider that covered your market segment last year might have changed their crawling priorities, and a company that matched your ICP criteria at last audit might have been acquired.

Silent degradation patterns:

• Provider coverage drift: Trigger providers adjust their crawling priorities based on their overall customer base, not your specific needs. If fewer of their customers care about your target segment, coverage quietly shrinks
• Source deprecation: A provider's data source (API access, partnership) expires or gets rate-limited, reducing signal quality without announcement
• ICP drift: Your product and market evolve, but your trigger configuration doesn't. You're still monitoring triggers calibrated to last year's ICP
• Duplicate suppression decay: Deduplication rules that worked with three data sources break when you add a fourth, causing duplicate triggers that inflate volume without adding value

The Fix

Build a continuous data quality monitoring program:

Weekly checks:

• Trigger volume by source and category (spot sudden drops)
• Duplicate rate (spot deduplication failures)
• Freshness distribution (what percentage of triggers are <7 days old?)

Monthly checks:

• Accuracy audit: Verify 50 random triggers against public sources
• Coverage check: Pick 20 target accounts and check how many had triggers in the last 30 days
• Provider comparison: If you use multiple sources, compare their output for the same events

Quarterly checks:

• ICP alignment review: Are your trigger configurations still matched to your current ICP?
• Provider SLA review: Is the provider meeting their contractual commitments?
• Scoring model recalibration: Do conversion rates by trigger type still match your scoring weights?

Action step: Set up a weekly trigger volume dashboard. This single metric catches most degradation patterns because volume drops are the first symptom of coverage, source, or integration problems.

---

10. Sales Triggers and Alerts Don't Include Enough Context for Personalized Outreach

The Cause

A trigger alert that says "Acme Corp: Funding Round" is better than nothing, but barely. The rep still needs to know:

• How much was raised?
• What stage?
• What's the stated use of funds?
• Who are the investors?
• What does this mean for their likely tech spending?
• Who at the company should I contact?
• What's a natural way to reference this in outreach without sounding like a data stalker?

Most trigger-based sales prospecting software delivers the event but not the context. This forces reps into a manual research loop — Googling the company, reading the press release, checking LinkedIn — that adds 15-30 minutes per trigger. At 20 triggers per day, that's 5-10 hours of research time that eats into actual selling time.

Without context-rich alerts, trigger-based selling becomes research-based selling with a trigger-shaped starting point.

The Fix

Enrich every trigger alert with actionable context before it reaches the rep:

Required context for every alert:

1. Event detail: What specifically happened (amount, participants, dates)
2. Business implication: What this event likely means for the company's priorities
3. Relevant contacts: 2-3 contacts at the company who are most likely involved or affected
4. Outreach angle: A suggested approach for referencing this trigger in outreach
5. Related signals: Other recent triggers from this account that create a compound narrative

How to build context enrichment:

• Use signal providers that deliver enriched, contextual data rather than raw events. Autobound's signal infrastructure delivers 700+ signal subtypes with structured metadata — so a funding round signal comes with amount, stage, investors, and related company intelligence, not just a headline
• Layer AI summarization on top of trigger data to generate outreach angles automatically
• Build template libraries mapped to trigger types that reps can customize in 2-3 minutes instead of 15-30

Resources like Autobound's sales trigger events templates provide ready-to-use outreach frameworks for common trigger types, dramatically reducing the research burden on reps.

Action step: Time your reps. How long does it take from trigger alert to personalized first outreach? If it's more than 10 minutes per trigger, your context enrichment is insufficient.

---

11. No Feedback Loop Between Sales Outcomes and Trigger Configuration

The Cause

This is the optimization failure that keeps trigger-based sales prospecting software from improving over time. Without a closed-loop connection between sales outcomes (which triggers led to meetings, pipeline, and revenue) and trigger configuration (which triggers to monitor, how to score them, how to route them), the system remains static while the market evolves.

Common feedback loop failures:

• No outcome tagging: Deals close, but nobody records which triggers preceded them
• No negative feedback: When triggers lead to dead ends, nobody flags the trigger type as underperforming
• Lagging analysis: Outcome data is reviewed quarterly instead of monthly, missing opportunities to adjust quickly
• Siloed ownership: The team that configures triggers (RevOps/Ops) doesn't talk regularly to the team that acts on them (Sales)

Without feedback, you're essentially running the same trigger playbook indefinitely — even as your market, product, ICP, and competitive landscape shift.

The Fix

Build a three-layer feedback system:

Layer 1: Rep-Level Feedback (Real-Time)

• Every trigger surfaced to a rep includes a one-click "useful / not useful" button
• Quarterly review: trigger types with >50% "not useful" ratings get deprioritized or removed
• This captures the qualitative judgment of the people closest to the buyer

Layer 2: Outcome Attribution (Monthly)

• When a meeting is booked, tag which trigger(s) preceded the first touchpoint
• When a deal closes, tag all triggers that were active during the sales cycle
• Monthly report: trigger-type conversion rates, ranked by meeting generation and pipeline influence

Layer 3: System Optimization (Quarterly)

• Recalibrate scoring model weights based on Layer 2 conversion data
• Adjust trigger monitoring to add high-performing signal types and remove low-performing ones
• Review alert thresholds and routing rules
• Evaluate new signal categories available from providers

For the state of trigger and signal-based prospecting in 2026, the most successful teams are those that treat their trigger configuration as a continuously learning system, not a one-time setup.

Action step: Implement Layer 1 this week (it's the lowest effort). Add a "thumbs up / thumbs down" field to every trigger-sourced CRM task. After 30 days, you'll have data to inform your first scoring recalibration.

---

The Trigger Opportunity Matrix: A Diagnostic Framework

Use this matrix to quickly diagnose which of the 11 failure points are most active in your organization:

Start by identifying which category produces the most symptoms in your organization, then prioritize the corresponding fixes.

---

Building a Trigger-Based Sales Prospecting Stack That Works

The ideal trigger-based prospecting architecture has five layers:

Layer 1: Signal Infrastructure

A unified platform that aggregates triggers from multiple sources, normalizes the data, and delivers it via API or data pipeline. This is your foundation — without it, every downstream layer struggles.

Autobound serves as this infrastructure layer for companies like ZoomInfo, 6sense, RocketReach, TechTarget, and G2 — platforms that build their own products on top of Autobound's signal data.

Layer 2: Scoring and Qualification

A transparent, multi-dimensional scoring model that weights triggers by type, recency, seniority, and correlation. Ideally implemented in your data warehouse (BigQuery, Snowflake) for flexibility and auditability.

Layer 3: Routing and Automation

CRM workflows that route scored triggers to the right rep with the right context, create tasks with appropriate urgency, and optionally enroll contacts in outreach sequences.

Layer 4: Engagement

The outreach layer where reps (or AI assistants) translate triggers into personalized messages. Templates, talk tracks, and AI drafting tools all live here.

Layer 5: Measurement and Optimization

Attribution tracking, feedback loops, and quarterly recalibration cycles that keep the entire system improving over time.

Most organizations have Layers 4 and 5 weakest. They've invested in data and integration but not in the operational and optimization layers that turn data into revenue.

---

Quick-Start: Fix Your Biggest Trigger Gaps in 30 Days

Week 1: Diagnose

• Count your trigger alerts per rep per day (target: <20 for Tier 1+2)
• Measure end-to-end latency from event to outreach
• Pull conversion rates by trigger type for last quarter
• Check entity resolution accuracy on a 50-signal sample

Week 2: Score and Filter

• Build a trigger scoring model based on historical conversion data
• Implement tiered alerting (Tier 1/2/3)
• Configure ICP filters on incoming triggers
• Evaluate signal providers if coverage gaps are critical

Week 3: Automate and Enrich

• Build automated task creation and routing for Tier 1 triggers
• Add context enrichment to alert templates
• Create trigger-specific outreach playbooks for top 5 trigger types
• Test signal-based selling approaches

Week 4: Measure and Loop

• Launch rep feedback mechanism (thumbs up/down)
• Implement trigger attribution tagging on new opportunities
• Set up weekly trigger volume monitoring dashboard
• Schedule first monthly optimization review

---

Conclusion: Missed Opportunities Are a System Problem, Not a Data Problem

The 11 causes of missed trigger-sale opportunities share a common theme: the problem is almost never that trigger data doesn't exist. The data is out there — in SEC filings, in hiring patterns, in competitive evaluations, in social activity, in technology adoption signals. The problem is that the system designed to detect, score, route, and act on that data has failure points that compound silently.

Fixing trigger-based sales prospecting software isn't about buying more data or adding more signal sources (though expanding coverage helps). It's about building the operational infrastructure — scoring, automation, enrichment, governance, feedback — that turns raw trigger data into revenue.

The companies that close the opportunity gap are the ones that treat their trigger system like a product: measured, maintained, and continuously improved.

---

Ready to close the trigger gap? Explore Autobound's signal data platform for 35+ sources and 700+ signal subtypes, or book a demo to see how trigger-based prospecting works with comprehensive signal coverage.