Skip to main content
Ares Management10-Q: Litigation material

Faces derivative lawsuit filed May 26, 2026, alleging excessive advisory fees.

What happened

A lawsuit against subsidiary Ares Capital Management alleges excessive advisory fees, seeking disgorgement of fees and rescission of the advisory agreement. This creates significant legal costs, reputational risk, and pressure to review fee structures and compliance processes.

Source

SEC EDGARAug 6, 2026

Quarterly report (Form 10-Q)

Ares Management 10-Q

Filing excerpt

On May 26, 2026, a derivative action was brought by Martin Siegel purportedly on behalf of Ares Capital Corporation (“ARCC”), as plaintiff, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Ares Capital Management LLC (“Ares Capital Management”), one of our indirect subsidiaries, received excessive advisory fees in violation of its statutory fiduciary duty under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).

sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1176948/000162828026054538/ares-20260630.htmRead the full source

Other signals in this filing (6)

Extracted by Autobound

From the Signal API record
Signal
10-Q: Litigation material

What this signalsFilings often name leadership changes, deals and spending plans.

Fiscal year end
06/30
Filed
Aug 6, 2026

More 10-Q signals at other companies

The full record

From the Signal API record

Details

CIK
1176948
Accession number
0001628280-26-054538
Filing year
2026
Fiscal year
0
Why it matters
Legal tech opportunity
Signal category
Risk

Topics and mentions

Regions named

  • New York

Extraction

Confidence
High
Relevance
90%
Sentiment
Negative
Detected
Aug 11, 2026
signal_type
sec-10q
signal_subtype
litigationMaterial

Use this data

Get every 10-Q signal for Ares Management and the companies you sell to, in the tools you already use.

  1. Ask Claude about it

    Connect Autobound to Claude, Claude Code or Cursor with MCP. Then ask: “What changed at Ares Management this week?”

  2. Send it to your own tools

    The Signal API returns 10-Q signals for any list of companies as JSON, for your CRM, warehouse or app.

  3. Try it free

    Sign up and spend your free credits on the companies you sell to.

    Start Free1,000 free credits

The API returns more than this page shows

This page shows a preview. The full sec-10q record in the Signal API and MCP can also have these 8 fields. Some fields are empty for some signals.

Company

  • linkedin_urlValue in the API
  • industriesValue in the API
  • employee_count_lowValue in the API
  • employee_count_highValue in the API
  • revenueValue in the API
  • descriptionValue in the API

Signal

  • signal_nameValue in the API
  • associationValue in the API
Show the full JSONThe record on this page and the API request

GET /v1/signals/f9fa339e-a2d9-4f54-8ea3-4b720ec44811 returns this record as JSON. POST /v1/companies/enrich returns every signal for aresmgmt.com.

{
  "signal_id": "f9fa339e-a2d9-4f54-8ea3-4b720ec44811",
  "signal_type": "sec-10q",
  "signal_subtype": "litigationMaterial",
  "detected_at": "2026-08-11T08:04:37.529+00:00",
  "company": {
    "name": "Ares Management",
    "domain": "aresmgmt.com"
  },
  "data": {
    "detail": "A lawsuit against subsidiary Ares Capital Management alleges excessive advisory fees, seeking disgorgement of fees and rescission of the advisory agreement. This creates significant legal costs, reputational risk, and pressure to review fee structures and compliance processes.",
    "summary": "Faces derivative lawsuit filed May 26, 2026, alleging excessive advisory fees.",
    "excerpts": "On May 26, 2026, a derivative action was brought by Martin Siegel purportedly on behalf of Ares Capital Corporation (“ARCC”), as plaintiff, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Ares Capital Management LLC (“Ares Capital Management”), one of our indirect subsidiaries, received excessive advisory fees in violation of its statutory fiduciary duty under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).",
    "relevance": 0.9,
    "sentiment": "negative",
    "confidence": "high",
    "source_url": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1176948/000162828026054538/ares-20260630.htm",
    "filing_date": "2026-08-06",
    "filing_year": 2026,
    "fiscal_year": 0,
    "fiscal_year_end": "06/30",
    "sales_relevance": "Legal tech opportunity",
    "signal_category": "risk",
    "regions_mentioned": [
      "New York"
    ]
  }
}

Long text fields are shortened on this page.

Looking up one signal by its id is free. Enrich costs 2 credits per signal returned; a call with no results is free.