Skip to main content
OpenEvidenceRevenue

ChatGPT for Clinicians vs OpenEvidence (2026): OpenAI's new free tool vs the platform doctors already use.

What happened

OpenEvidence had revenue of $100M on Jan 1st '26.

Source

Article excerpt

Highlighted: the sentence this signal was extracted from

ChatGPT for Clinicians vs OpenEvidence (2026): OpenAI's new free tool vs the platform doctors already use. Two free clinician-facing AI tools now compete for daily use by working doctors. ChatGPT for Clinicians, launched by OpenAI on 22 April 2026, enters a market where OpenEvidence already processes approximately 15 million clinical consultations per month from over 757,000 verified clinicians. Both are free. Both target individual physicians. The approaches to trust, evidence grounding, and revenue differ fundamentally. Business model. ChatGPT for Clinicians is free as part of OpenAI's three-tier healthcare stack (consumer | individual clinician | enterprise). The revenue model for this specific product is unclear - most likely a funnel to ChatGPT for Healthcare, the enterprise product deployed at AdventHealth, HCA, Cedars-Sinai, and five other major US institutions at custom enterprise pricing. OpenAI does not need this product to generate revenue directly; it needs it to build clinician familiarity with GPT-5 before selling the enterprise product to their hospitals. OpenEvidence is free and ad-funded. Pharmaceutical companies pay to advertise during loading screens while answers generate - CPMs reportedly in the $70-150+ range, orders of magnitude higher than consumer social media advertising. OpenEvidence reached $100 million in annualised revenue by January 2026 on...

Keep reading with a free account

The rest of this article, and every signal for OpenEvidence, is in your free account.

Extracted by Autobound

From the Signal API record
Event
Revenue

What this signalsRevenue results often set the next budget cycle.

Amount named
$100M
Takes effect
Jan 1, 2026
Amount as written
$100 million

More revenue signals at other companies

The full record

From the Signal API record

Numbers

Amount named in the story
$100M

Details

Category
Has revenue

Extraction

Confidence
59%
Detected
Apr 25, 2026
signal_type
news
signal_subtype
has_revenue

Use this data

Get every revenue signal for OpenEvidence and the companies you sell to, in the tools you already use.

  1. Ask Claude about it

    Connect Autobound to Claude, Claude Code or Cursor with MCP. Then ask: “What changed at OpenEvidence this week?”

  2. Send it to your own tools

    The Signal API returns revenue signals for any list of companies as JSON, for your CRM, warehouse or app.

  3. Try it free

    Sign up and spend your free credits on the companies you sell to.

    Start Free1,000 free credits

The API returns more than this page shows

This page shows a preview. The full news record in the Signal API and MCP can also have these 8 fields. Some fields are empty for some signals.

Company

  • linkedin_urlValue in the API
  • industriesValue in the API
  • employee_count_lowValue in the API
  • employee_count_highValue in the API
  • revenueValue in the API
  • descriptionValue in the API

Signal

  • signal_nameValue in the API
  • associationValue in the API
Show the full JSONThe record on this page and the API request

GET /v1/signals/dadc6e38-650c-4185-b240-3f4a2243f67c returns this record as JSON. POST /v1/companies/enrich returns every signal for openevidence.com.

{
  "signal_id": "dadc6e38-650c-4185-b240-3f4a2243f67c",
  "signal_type": "news",
  "signal_subtype": "has_revenue",
  "detected_at": "2026-04-25T00:46:49+00:00",
  "company": {
    "name": "OpenEvidence",
    "domain": "openevidence.com"
  },
  "data": {
    "url": "https://www.iatrox.com/blog/chatgpt-for-clinicians-vs-openevidence-2026",
    "title": "ChatGPT for Clinicians vs OpenEvidence (2026): OpenAI's new free tool vs the platform doctors already use.",
    "amount": "$100 million",
    "excerpt": "ChatGPT for Clinicians vs OpenEvidence (2026): OpenAI's new free tool vs the platform doctors already use.\n\nTwo free clinician-facing AI tools now compete for daily use by working doctors. ChatGPT for Clinicians, launched by OpenAI on 22 April 2026, enters a market where OpenEvidence already processes approximately 15 million clinical consultations per month from over 757,000 verified clinicians. Both are free. Both target individual physicians. The approaches to trust, evidence grounding, and revenue differ fundamentally.\n\nBusiness model.\n\nChatGPT for Clinicians is free as part of OpenAI's three-tier healthcare stack (consumer | individual clinician | enterprise). The revenue model for this specific product is unclear - most likely a funnel to ChatGPT for Healthcare, the enterprise product deployed at AdventHealth, HCA, Cedars-Sinai, and five other major US institutions at custom enterprise pricing. OpenAI does not need this product to generate revenue directly; it needs it to build clinician familiarity with GPT-5 before selling the enterprise product to their hospitals.\n\nOpenEvidence is free and ad-funded. Pharmaceutical companies pay to advertise during loading screens while answers generate - CPMs reportedly in the $70-150+ range, orders of magnitude higher than consumer social media advertising. OpenEvidence reached $100 million in annualised revenue by January 2026 on a...",
    "summary": "OpenEvidence had revenue of $100M on Jan 1st '26.",
    "category": "has_revenue",
    "found_at": "2026-04-25T00:46:49Z",
    "planning": false,
    "image_url": "https://www.iatrox.com/images/MedicalImage1310.png",
    "confidence": 0.5942,
    "published_at": "2026-04-25T00:46:49Z",
    "effective_date": "2026-01-01",
    "article_sentence": "OpenEvidence reached $100 million in annualised revenue by January 2026 on a $12 billion valuation, backed by approximately $700 million in total funding from GV, Sequoia, NVIDIA, Kleiner Perkins, Blackstone, and Mayo Clinic.",
    "amount_normalized": 100000000
  }
}

Long text fields are shortened on this page.

Looking up one signal by its id is free. Enrich costs 2 credits per signal returned; a call with no results is free.