Skip to main content
DataminrLinkedIn

Dataminr's Field Cyber Intelligence Officer discusses prioritizing vulnerabilities beyond CVSS scores.

Source

LinkedInAug 11, 2026
likes
16
comments
0

Post

Median time-to-patch stretched from 32 to 43 days this year. This is an alarming stat when you consider that attacker breakout time is 29 minutes. No security team is out-patching that gap. The question worth asking is simple: does this specific flaw matter, right now, to us? CVSS tells you technical severity. It doesn't tell you whether a vulnerability is being actively exploited or whether an attacker can actually reach it in your environment. It definitely doesn't tell you what a compromise could mean for the business. The better questions are: ➤ Is it exploitable? ➤ Is it exposed? ➤ Is it material? Jeanette Miller-Osborn, Dataminr's Field Cyber Intelligence Officer, draws on Dataminr's 2026 Mid-Year Threat Landscape Report to explain why those three questions matter more than working down a patching queue by severity alone. Read "CVSS Is Telling You the Wrong Thing": https://lnkd.in/gTS9auS8 #Dataminr #CVSS #AI # Cybersecurity

linkedin.com/posts/dataminr_dataminr-cvss-ai-activity-749296804730202...Read the full source

Extracted by Autobound

From the Signal API record
Signal
LinkedIn

What this signalsCompany posts often show what the team is pushing right now.

The full record

From the Signal API record

Topics and mentions

Tags

  • Cyber Security
  • Information Security
  • Threat Intelligence
  • Risk

Initiatives

  • evaluating vulnerabilities based on exploitability
  • exposure
  • and materiality
  • evaluating vulnerabilities based on exploitability, exposure, and materiality

Pain points

  • median time-to-patch increased to 43 days
  • gap between patching and attacker breakout time

Technologies named

  • CVSS
  • AI

Extraction

Detected
Aug 13, 2026
signal_type
linkedin-post-company
signal_subtype
linkedinPost

Use this data

Get every LinkedIn signal for Dataminr and the companies you sell to, in the tools you already use.

  1. Ask Claude about it

    Connect Autobound to Claude, Claude Code or Cursor with MCP. Then ask: “What changed at Dataminr this week?”

  2. Send it to your own tools

    The Signal API returns LinkedIn signals for any list of companies as JSON, for your CRM, warehouse or app.

  3. Try it free

    Sign up and spend your free credits on the companies you sell to.

    Start Free1,000 free credits

The API returns more than this page shows

This page shows a preview. The full linkedin-post-company record in the Signal API and MCP can also have these 8 fields. Some fields are empty for some signals.

Company

  • linkedin_urlValue in the API
  • industriesValue in the API
  • employee_count_lowValue in the API
  • employee_count_highValue in the API
  • revenueValue in the API
  • descriptionValue in the API

Signal

  • signal_nameValue in the API
  • associationValue in the API
Show the full JSONThe record on this page and the API request

GET /v1/signals/22d8edca-9d63-4644-b8e4-c5d49d237e41 returns this record as JSON. POST /v1/companies/enrich returns every signal for dataminr.com.

{
  "signal_id": "22d8edca-9d63-4644-b8e4-c5d49d237e41",
  "signal_type": "linkedin-post-company",
  "signal_subtype": "linkedinPost",
  "detected_at": "2026-08-13T08:56:06.188+00:00",
  "company": {
    "name": "Dataminr",
    "domain": "dataminr.com"
  },
  "data": {
    "tags": [
      "Cyber Security",
      "Information Security",
      "Risk",
      "Threat Intelligence"
    ],
    "summary": "Dataminr's Field Cyber Intelligence Officer discusses prioritizing vulnerabilities beyond CVSS scores.",
    "post_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dataminr_dataminr-cvss-ai-activity-7492968047302021121-rz2t",
    "num_likes": 16,
    "post_text": "Median time-to-patch stretched from 32 to 43 days this year. This is an alarming stat when you consider that attacker breakout time is 29 minutes.\n\nNo security team is out-patching that gap. The question worth asking is simple: does this specific flaw matter, right now, to us?\n\nCVSS tells you technical severity. It doesn't tell you whether a vulnerability is being actively exploited or whether an attacker can actually reach it in your environment. It definitely doesn't tell you what a compromise could mean for the business.\n\nThe better questions are:\n➤ Is it exploitable?\n➤ Is it exposed?\n➤ Is it material?\n\nJeanette Miller-Osborn, Dataminr's Field Cyber Intelligence Officer, draws on Dataminr's 2026 Mid-Year Threat Landscape Report to explain why those three questions matter more than working down a patching queue by severity alone.\n\nRead \"CVSS Is Telling You the Wrong Thing\": https://lnkd.in/gTS9auS8\n\n#Dataminr #CVSS #AI # Cybersecurity",
    "initiatives": [
      {
        "topic": "evaluating vulnerabilities based on exploitability, exposure, and materiality",
        "urgency": 0.8
      }
    ],
    "pain_points": [
      {
        "topic": "median time-to-patch increased to 43 days",
        "intensity": 0.7
      },
      {
        "topic": "gap between patching and attacker breakout time",
        "intensity": 0.6
      }
    ],
    "posted_date": "2026-08-11T15:39:55.091Z",
    "num_comments": 0,
    "technologies_mentioned": [
      {
        "name": "CVSS",
        "status": "evaluating"
      },
      {
        "name": "AI",
        "status": "using"
      }
    ]
  }
}

Long text fields are shortened on this page.

Looking up one signal by its id is free. Enrich costs 2 credits per signal returned; a call with no results is free.