Skip to main content
TenablePricing concerns

Mid-Market user states increasing costs, seeks competitive pricing for transition

What happened

A Verified User in the Oil & Energy industry, representing a mid-market company (51-1000 employees), expresses concern that the costs of Tenable Nessus are increasing over the years. This user hopes to see competitive pricing for future transitions, indicating a potential vulnerability to competitors offering better pricing as their current contract comes up for renewal.

Source

From the reviews

  • 5 of 5
    “Costs are increasing over the years and we feel like SC and cloud solutions will be left within few years. We'd love to see competitive pricing for transition. Technically speaking I have nothing to dislike about your product.”

    Verified User in Oil & Energy, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)Aug 10, 2026View

Extracted by Autobound

From the Signal API record
Signal
Pricing concerns

What this signalsReview themes often show where customers may look for an alternative.

Product
Tenable Nessus
Star rating
5 of 5
Reviewer
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Reviewer details
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

More product review signals at other companies

The full record

From the Signal API record

Details

Switching intent
Yes

Extraction

Detected
Aug 11, 2026
signal_type
product-reviews
signal_subtype
PricingConcerns

Use this data

Get every product review signal for Tenable and the companies you sell to, in the tools you already use.

  1. Ask Claude about it

    Connect Autobound to Claude, Claude Code or Cursor with MCP. Then ask: “What changed at Tenable this week?”

  2. Send it to your own tools

    The Signal API returns product review signals for any list of companies as JSON, for your CRM, warehouse or app.

  3. Try it free

    Sign up and spend your free credits on the companies you sell to.

    Start Free1,000 free credits

The API returns more than this page shows

This page shows a preview. The full product-reviews record in the Signal API and MCP can also have these 8 fields. Some fields are empty for some signals.

Company

  • linkedin_urlValue in the API
  • industriesValue in the API
  • employee_count_lowValue in the API
  • employee_count_highValue in the API
  • revenueValue in the API
  • descriptionValue in the API

Signal

  • signal_nameValue in the API
  • associationValue in the API
Show the full JSONThe record on this page and the API request

GET /v1/signals/c8f7658f-a500-45c4-8b3a-644aaba7d97c returns this record as JSON. POST /v1/companies/enrich returns every signal for tenable.com.

{
  "signal_id": "c8f7658f-a500-45c4-8b3a-644aaba7d97c",
  "signal_type": "product-reviews",
  "signal_subtype": "PricingConcerns",
  "detected_at": "2026-08-11T12:38:34.221+00:00",
  "company": {
    "name": "Tenable",
    "domain": "tenable.com"
  },
  "data": {
    "summary": "A Verified User in the Oil & Energy industry, representing a mid-market company (51-1000 employees), expresses concern that the costs of Tenable Nessus are increasing over the years. This user hopes to see competitive pricing for future transitions, indicating a potential vulnerability to competitors offering better pricing as their current contract comes up for renewal.",
    "evidence": [
      {
        "quote": "Costs are increasing over the years and we feel like SC and cloud solutions will be left within few years. We'd love to see competitive pricing for transition. Technically speaking I have nothing to dislike about your product.",
        "review_url": "https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews#review-13234129",
        "review_date": "2026-08-10",
        "star_rating": 5,
        "reviewer_name": "Verified User in Oil & Energy",
        "reviewer_title": "Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)"
      }
    ],
    "headline": "Mid-Market user states increasing costs, seeks competitive pricing for transition",
    "relevance": 65,
    "product_name": "Tenable Nessus",
    "source_page_url": "https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews/reviews",
    "switching_intent": {
      "urgency": "considering",
      "detected": true,
      "signal_phrase": "We'd love to see competitive pricing for transition."
    },
    "quantified_impact": {
      "has_numbers": false
    },
    "decision_maker_complaint": {
      "title": "Verified User in Oil & Energy",
      "is_decision_maker": false
    }
  }
}

Long text fields are shortened on this page.

Looking up one signal by its id is free. Enrich costs 2 credits per signal returned; a call with no results is free.