Skip to main content
Mistral AICustomer feedback

A benchmark of seven document parsing APIs found Mistral OCR was the fastest with a 4.2s median latency, but had the lowest accuracy at 0.884 and tended to hallucinate values for empty fields.

What happened

Post: "I benchmarked 7 document parsing APIs on the same 11 PDFs. None of them were good at everything."

Source

Post

Highlighted: the lines this signal was extracted from

I got tired of document parsing comparisons that basically compare pricing pages, so I actually called the APIs. I took 11 documents from public datasets, including invoices, a photographed receipt, contracts, a French bank statement, a noisy scanned form, a handwritten cheque, and a medical EOB. 35 pages total. 119 API calls. Every provider got the same PDF, same JSON schema, same extraction instructions, same timeout, and the normal/default mode. I also deliberately included fields where the correct answer was null to see which systems would guess anyway. Here’s where things landed: Provider Field accuracy Row F1 Hallucinations Missing Median latency Claude 0.991 0.99 0 2 6.4s GPT 0.982 0.99 0 2 10.1s Reducto 0.982 0.99 0 4 10.1s Extend 0.962 1.00 0 2 22.1s Textract 0.936 0.99 2 1 14.4s LlamaExtract 0.903 0.99 3 3 22.5s Mistral OCR 0.884 0.99 3 3 4.2s There wasn’t really one winner here, which was probably the most useful part of the test. Claude had the best raw field accuracy. GPT was the cheapest per correct field. Mistral was the fastest. Extend was the only one that got 1.00 row F1, so it didn’t miss a single table row in this run. It also had zero hallucinations, though Claude, GPT, and Reducto did too. Here's some random stuff I noticed while going through the failures. Mistral and Textract would sometimes see...

Keep reading with a free account

The rest of this post, and every signal for Mistral AI, is in your free account.

Also quoted as evidence

  • Mistral and Textract would sometimes see an empty field and grab some other value from the document instead.

    From the post

  • Mistral OCR Field accuracy 0.884 Row F1 0.99 Hallucinations 3 Missing 3 Median latency 4.2s

    From the post

Comments on the post

5 of 19 comments
  • “Would be curious to check out the code!”

    u/grilledCheeseFish2 points · Sep 21, 2026View

  • “Hey ! May I check your code ? As someone working with tables extraction and textract, im highly interested in other methods. I feel that out of the box textract do a great job, however, im kinda stuck on how should I check for errors or even make corrections”

    u/Tururuts2 points · Sep 21, 2026View

  • “I would 😀, simply to see how our own setup based on NuExtract 3 and Qwen VL 30B holds up when I run your corpus on it. Thanks!”

    u/Such-War19551 points · Sep 21, 2026View

  • “You need a couple magnitudes more than 11 PDFs to make a generalization. You might just have shitty PDFs.”

    u/DorkyMcDorky1 points · Sep 21, 2026View

  • “I challenge you to use anyformat, its thought for more complex documents than the typical tool. BTW you can use the free credits in the platform for this. Happy to know your result with it :)”

    u/Potential-Wrangler581 points · Sep 21, 2026View

Extracted by Autobound

From the Signal API record
Signal
Customer feedback

What this signalsUser posts often show product pain before it reaches reviews or churn.

Subreddit
r/Rag

Companies

  • AnthropicAlso named
  • OpenAIAlso named
  • ReductoAlso named
  • ExtendAlso named
  • Amazon Web ServicesAlso named
  • LlamaExtractAlso named

The full record

From the Signal API record

Numbers

Mentions
3

Details

Timing
Completed
Category
Features
Virality
Somewhat high
Post kind
Text
Prominence
Core
Company's role
Vendor

Topics and mentions

Topics

  • document parsing
  • benchmark
  • accuracy
  • api
  • speed

Flair

  • Discussion

Products named

  • Mistral OCR

Extraction

Sentiment
Mixed
Detected
Sep 21, 2026
signal_type
reddit-company
signal_subtype
customerFeedback

Use this data

Get every Reddit signal for Mistral AI and the companies you sell to, in the tools you already use.

  1. Ask Claude about it

    Connect Autobound to Claude, Claude Code or Cursor with MCP. Then ask: “What changed at Mistral AI this week?”

  2. Send it to your own tools

    The Signal API returns Reddit signals for any list of companies as JSON, for your CRM, warehouse or app.

  3. Try it free

    Sign up and spend your free credits on the companies you sell to.

    Start Free1,000 free credits

The API returns more than this page shows

This page shows a preview. The full reddit-company record in the Signal API and MCP can also have these 8 fields. Some fields are empty for some signals.

Company

  • linkedin_urlValue in the API
  • industriesValue in the API
  • employee_count_lowValue in the API
  • employee_count_highValue in the API
  • revenueValue in the API
  • descriptionValue in the API

Signal

  • signal_nameValue in the API
  • associationValue in the API
Show the full JSONThe record on this page and the API request

GET /v1/signals/ced210e7-e5a3-5877-a9a4-821a3d81f2e3 returns this record as JSON. POST /v1/companies/enrich returns every signal for mistral.ai.

{
  "signal_id": "ced210e7-e5a3-5877-a9a4-821a3d81f2e3",
  "signal_type": "reddit-company",
  "signal_subtype": "customerFeedback",
  "detected_at": "2026-09-21T13:03:34+00:00",
  "company": {
    "name": "Mistral AI",
    "domain": "mistral.ai"
  },
  "data": {
    "nsfw": false,
    "stage": "none",
    "awards": 0,
    "timing": "completed",
    "topics": [
      "document parsing",
      "api",
      "benchmark",
      "speed",
      "accuracy"
    ],
    "post_id": "1wmc7n2",
    "summary": "A benchmark of seven document parsing APIs found Mistral OCR was the fastest with a 4.2s median latency, but had the lowest accuracy at 0.884 and tended to hallucinate values for empty fields.",
    "category": "features",
    "comments": [
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pb666vx/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 2,
        "author": "grilledCheeseFish",
        "excerpt": "Would be curious to check out the code!",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-21T14:37:04.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/grilledCheeseFish/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pb6o5q4/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 2,
        "author": "Tururuts",
        "excerpt": "Hey ! May I check your code ? As someone working with tables extraction and textract, im highly interested in other methods. I feel that out of the box textract do a great job, however, im kinda stuck on how should I check for errors or even make corrections",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-21T15:53:16.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/Tururuts/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pb5q3zo/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 1,
        "author": "Such-War1955",
        "excerpt": "I would 😀, simply to see how our own setup based on NuExtract 3 and Qwen VL 30B holds up when I run your corpus on it.\n\n Thanks!",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-21T13:22:41.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/Such-War1955/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pb5tm7x/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 1,
        "author": "DorkyMcDorky",
        "excerpt": "You need a couple magnitudes more than 11 PDFs to make a generalization. You might just have shitty PDFs.",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-21T13:39:35.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/DorkyMcDorky/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pb63luq/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 1,
        "author": "Potential-Wrangler58",
        "excerpt": "I challenge you to use anyformat, its thought for more complex documents than the typical tool. BTW you can use the free credits in the platform for this. Happy to know your result with it :)",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-21T14:25:33.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/Potential-Wrangler58/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pb9xfbf/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 1,
        "author": "patbhakta",
        "excerpt": "do you have a link for the PDF, would like to test it on my setup.",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-22T00:44:00.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/patbhakta/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pbb22fx/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 1,
        "author": "Numerous_Season4741",
        "excerpt": "How are you matching rows for row F1, and does field accuracy include the table cells?\n\n I'd test the scorer with all rows present but quantity and unit price swapped between columns. It should flag those wrong assignments even though no rows are missing.\n\n If row F1 only measures coverage, I'd show cell-content accuracy beside it. GriTS is a useful reference for evaluating table structure and cel",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-22T04:45:50.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/Numerous_Season4741/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/comment/pbklozq/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 1,
        "author": "ProtectionOk80",
        "excerpt": "Try GoodMem.ai",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-23T14:24:36.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/ProtectionOk80/"
      }
    ],
    "evidence": [
      "[post] Mistral was the fastest.",
      "[post] Mistral and Textract would sometimes see an empty field and grab some other value from the document instead.",
      "[post] Mistral OCR\n\nField accuracy\n\n0.884\n\nRow F1\n\n0.99\n\nHallucinations\n\n3\n\nMissing\n\n3\n\nMedian latency\n\n4.2s"
    ],
    "virality": "somewhat_high",
    "post_date": "2026-09-21T13:03:34.000Z",
    "post_kind": "text",
    "post_text": "I got tired of document parsing comparisons that basically compare pricing pages, so I actually called the APIs.\n\nI took 11 documents from public datasets, including invoices, a photographed receipt, contracts, a French bank statement, a noisy scanned form, a handwritten cheque, and a medical EOB.\n\n35 pages total. 119 API calls.\n\nEvery provider got the same PDF, same JSON schema, same extraction instructions, same timeout, and the normal/default mode. I also deliberately included fields where the correct answer was null to see which systems would guess anyway.\n\nHere’s where things landed:\n\nProvider\n\nField accuracy\n\nRow F1\n\nHallucinations\n\nMissing\n\nMedian latency\n\nClaude\n\n0.991\n\n0.99\n\n0\n\n2\n\n6.4s\n\nGPT\n\n0.982\n\n0.99\n\n0\n\n2\n\n10.1s\n\nReducto\n\n0.982\n\n0.99\n\n0\n\n4\n\n10.1s\n\nExtend\n\n0.962\n\n1.00\n\n0\n\n2\n\n22.1s\n\nTextract\n\n0.936\n\n0.99\n\n2\n\n1\n\n14.4s\n\nLlamaExtract\n\n0.903\n\n0.99\n\n3\n\n3\n\n22.5s\n\nMistral OCR\n\n0.884\n\n0.99\n\n3\n\n3\n\n4.2s\n\nThere wasn’t really one winner here, which was probably the most useful part of the test.\n\nClaude had the best raw field accuracy. GPT was the cheapest per correct field. Mistral was the fastest. Extend was the only one that got 1.00 row F1, so it didn’t miss a single table row in this run. It also had zero hallucinations, though Claude, GPT, and Reducto did too.\n\nHere's some random stuff I noticed while going through the failures.\n\nMistral and Textract would sometimes see an...",
    "sentiment": "mixed",
    "subreddit": "Rag",
    "post_flair": [
      "Discussion"
    ],
    "post_title": "I benchmarked 7 document parsing APIs on the same 11 PDFs. None of them were good at everything.",
    "prominence": "core",
    "source_url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/comments/1wmc7n2/i_benchmarked_7_document_parsing_apis_on_the_same/",
    "entity_role": "vendor",
    "post_author": "latentnoise_",
    "upvote_ratio": 1,
    "mention_count": 3,
    "mention_surge": true,
    "subreddit_url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/Rag/",
    "total_upvotes": 24,
    "comments_total": 19,
    "total_comments": 19,
    "other_companies": [
      {
        "name": "Anthropic",
        "role": "competitor",
        "domain": "anthropic.com"
      },
      {
        "name": "OpenAI",
        "role": "competitor",
        "domain": "openai.com"
      },
      {
        "name": "Reducto",
        "role": "competitor",
        "domain": "reducto.ai"
      },
      {
        "name": "Extend",
        "role": "competitor",
        "domain": "extend.ai"
      },
      {
        "name": "Amazon Web Services",
        "role": "competitor",
        "domain": "amazon.com"
      },
      {
        "name": "LlamaExtract",
        "role": "competitor",
        "domain": "llamaindex.ai"
      }
    ],
    "post_author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/latentnoise_/",
    "signal_category": "feedback",
    "comments_included": 8,
    "products_mentioned": [
      "Mistral OCR"
    ]
  }
}

Long text fields are shortened on this page.

Looking up one signal by its id is free. Enrich costs 2 credits per signal returned; a call with no results is free.