Salesforce wants to charge for AI outcomes, but first it needs to figure out how
Article excerpt
Highlighted: the sentence this signal was extracted from
software Seats, Flex Credits, and all-you-can-eat contracts make for an 'anxiety-filled architecture' Nothing demonstrates how deeply Fortune 500 companies depend on Salesforce quite like a global outage lasting more than seven hours. The interruption struck during the second day of last week's Dreamforce conference, where the $40 billion-a-year SaaS vendor was pitching AIforce and a growing collection of AI products. The question now is how the company will charge for them. AIforce illustrates why the per-user licensing model is becoming harder to sustain. Unveiled at Dreamforce, it uses Salesforce's Headless Toolkit to make the company's data, workflows, and business logic available through interfaces including Slack and Claude. When AI agents and APIs perform the work instead of named human users occupying seats, charging per user becomes a less natural fit. Earlier this month, Bill Patterson, executive veep and general manager of CRM applications, told an investor webinar that Salesforce was devising "a new pricing structure that really aligns to the benefits that customers realize from this new technology." Under one such arrangement, AI customer service agents would be priced according to the cases they resolve. Outcome-based pricing will not suit every use case, however. Patterson acknowledged that some agents operate across multiple disciplines, domains, and products...
Keep reading with a free account
The rest of this article, and every signal for Salesforce, is in your free account.
