Skip to main content
HarveyCustomer feedback

A commenter suggests that off-the-shelf legal AI tools like Harvey are sufficient for 99% of legal research needs, implying bespoke AI development is unnecessary.

What happened

Post: "Morgan & Morgan is spending $1 billion on AI. What happens to the firms that can’t?"

Source

RedditSep 18, 2026By u/DhowDaddy

r/legaltech

Morgan & Morgan is spending $1 billion on AI. What happens to the firms that can’t?

upvotes
17
comments
34

Post

Morgan & Morgan just committed $1 billion to AI and technology over the next decade. They have already spent roughly $300 million building their own internal AI platform, MX2, which reportedly has nearly 5,000 monthly users. It is being used for things like medical record extraction, document generation, case search, trial preparation, and agentic workflows. The most interesting part to me isn't the $1 billion number. It's what this means for everyone else. Morgan & Morgan can hire engineers and build proprietary AI infrastructure around the way its lawyers actually practice. The average 5, 20, or 50 lawyer firm obviously can't spend hundreds of millions building its own technology. But those firms are competing in the same market. Over the next few years, I think we're going to see a growing divide between firms that simply give their lawyers access to ChatGPT or another AI tool and firms that actually redesign their workflows around AI. Those are two very different things. An AI-native law firm isn't necessarily a firm with its own model or engineering team. It could simply be a firm where intake, research, drafting, document review, knowledge management, client communication, and administrative work have been intentionally rebuilt around AI, while lawyers remain responsible for judgment and final work product. Morgan & Morgan's bet seems to be that this becomes a...

Keep reading with a free account

The rest of this post, and every signal for Harvey, is in your free account.

Extracted from these lines

  • [comment u/pengy452] I think eventually it will be more or less equalized. If you are doing legal research then the Reuters cocounsel or basic Harvey will basically cover 99% of what you need. These bespoke AI plays are a waste of money in my opinion

Comments on the post

5 of 34 comments
  • “For perspective, Google spends $490M a day on AI infrastructure and can't beat the small underfunded chinese companies. This space is more about skill than bankroll (unless you're just buying GPUs).”

    u/sorryiamcanadian27 points · Sep 18, 2026View

  • “The reason Morgan needs to spend $1 billion is that they have 5,000 users, so will need to have differentiated functionality for the user base, and also need to spend money on consistency, reliability, and usability. A five-person law firm doesn't need any of that if they have five lawyers, each with high-level skill set in using AI platforms. Morgan's big benefit will be in being able to process”

    u/Capt_HawkeyePierce19 points · Sep 18, 2026View

  • “Morgan and Morgan’s clients would generally be better served by today’s public Ai models than Morgan and Morgan lawyers. I’m sorta kinda not really joking, but they overload their attorneys, leading to overwhelm and poor work product. This is exactly the sort of firm that will benefit from AI. They operate on contingency. They’re not going to lower their % take and their clients find them from b”

    u/barrorg9 points · Sep 18, 2026View

  • “it's a marketing phrasing. I too am committing to spend up to $100 million if circumstances justify it. They just never will.”

    u/ev29m8tv9gejefc4 points · Sep 18, 2026View

  • “My bet is they're dying. But - there are those who say it's not about big budgets, just data structure and small language models that can run on a regular computer. Idk.”

    u/Flutterpiewow3 points · Sep 18, 2026View

Extracted by Autobound

From the Signal API record
Signal
Customer feedback

What this signalsUser posts often show product pain before it reaches reviews or churn.

Subreddit
r/legaltech

Companies

  • Thomson ReutersAlso named

The full record

From the Signal API record

Numbers

Mentions
4

Details

Timing
Ongoing state
Category
Features
Link URL
/r/AINativeLawFirms/comments/1wjvoh1/morgan_morgan_is_spending_1_billion_on_ai_what/
Virality
Somewhat high
Post kind
Crosspost
Prominence
Aside
Company's role
Vendor

Topics and mentions

Topics

  • legaltech
  • legal research
  • vendor comparison
  • ai

Flair

  • Question / Tech Stack Advice

Extraction

Sentiment
Positive
Detected
Sep 18, 2026
signal_type
reddit-company
signal_subtype
customerFeedback

Use this data

Get every Reddit signal for Harvey and the companies you sell to, in the tools you already use.

  1. Ask Claude about it

    Connect Autobound to Claude, Claude Code or Cursor with MCP. Then ask: “What changed at Harvey this week?”

  2. Send it to your own tools

    The Signal API returns Reddit signals for any list of companies as JSON, for your CRM, warehouse or app.

  3. Try it free

    Sign up and spend your free credits on the companies you sell to.

    Start Free1,000 free credits

The API returns more than this page shows

This page shows a preview. The full reddit-company record in the Signal API and MCP can also have these 8 fields. Some fields are empty for some signals.

Company

  • linkedin_urlValue in the API
  • industriesValue in the API
  • employee_count_lowValue in the API
  • employee_count_highValue in the API
  • revenueValue in the API
  • descriptionValue in the API

Signal

  • signal_nameValue in the API
  • associationValue in the API
Show the full JSONThe record on this page and the API request

GET /v1/signals/419e77d8-b542-5ee7-a180-1e79dddf6ddb returns this record as JSON. POST /v1/companies/enrich returns every signal for harvey.ai.

{
  "signal_id": "419e77d8-b542-5ee7-a180-1e79dddf6ddb",
  "signal_type": "reddit-company",
  "signal_subtype": "customerFeedback",
  "detected_at": "2026-09-18T16:56:05+00:00",
  "company": {
    "name": "Harvey",
    "domain": "harvey.ai"
  },
  "data": {
    "nsfw": false,
    "stage": "none",
    "awards": 0,
    "timing": "ongoing_state",
    "topics": [
      "legaltech",
      "ai",
      "legal research",
      "vendor comparison"
    ],
    "post_id": "1wjvpoy",
    "summary": "A commenter suggests that off-the-shelf legal AI tools like Harvey are sufficient for 99% of legal research needs, implying bespoke AI development is unnecessary.",
    "category": "features",
    "comments": [
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/palukrt/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 27,
        "author": "sorryiamcanadian",
        "excerpt": "For perspective, Google spends $490M a day on AI infrastructure and can't beat the small underfunded chinese companies. This space is more about skill than bankroll (unless you're just buying GPUs).",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T17:01:24.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/sorryiamcanadian/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/palzx04/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 19,
        "author": "Capt_HawkeyePierce",
        "excerpt": "The reason Morgan needs to spend $1 billion is that they have 5,000 users, so will need to have differentiated functionality for the user base, and also need to spend money on consistency, reliability, and usability. A five-person law firm doesn't need any of that if they have five lawyers, each with high-level skill set in using AI platforms. Morgan's big benefit will be in being able to process",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T17:24:11.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/Capt_HawkeyePierce/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/pamhs2e/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 9,
        "author": "barrorg",
        "excerpt": "Morgan and Morgan’s clients would generally be better served by today’s public Ai models than Morgan and Morgan lawyers. I’m sorta kinda not really joking, but they overload their attorneys, leading to overwhelm and poor work product. This is exactly the sort of firm that will benefit from AI.\n\n They operate on contingency. They’re not going to lower their % take and their clients find them from b",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T18:41:12.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/barrorg/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/pamgm4m/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 4,
        "author": "ev29m8tv9gejefc",
        "excerpt": "it's a marketing phrasing. I too am committing to spend up to $100 million if circumstances justify it. They just never will.",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T18:36:09.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/ev29m8tv9gejefc/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/palwm4k/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 3,
        "author": "Flutterpiewow",
        "excerpt": "My bet is they're dying. But - there are those who say it's not about big budgets, just data structure and small language models that can run on a regular computer. Idk.",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T17:10:08.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/Flutterpiewow/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/paoelqt/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 3,
        "author": "SkyCoi",
        "excerpt": "Don’t sell them short, they’re very tech savvy and innovative. They created their own practice management tool, Litify. They’ve already standardized and automated many processes, AI is a slam dunk to make Tom bajllions.",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-19T00:16:21.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/SkyCoi/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/pam0njf/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 3,
        "author": "DDGJD",
        "excerpt": "This may be one of the stupidest economic decisions possible…",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T17:27:19.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/DDGJD/"
      },
      {
        "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/comment/palujx9/",
        "depth": 0,
        "score": 2,
        "author": "A_Novelty-Account",
        "excerpt": "We don’t know, but these firms aren’t waiting to find out.",
        "posted_at": "2026-09-18T17:01:17.000Z",
        "author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/A_Novelty-Account/"
      }
    ],
    "evidence": [
      "[comment u/pengy452] I think eventually it will be more or less equalized. If you are doing legal research then the Reuters cocounsel or basic Harvey will basically cover 99% of what you need. These bespoke AI plays are a waste of money in my opinion"
    ],
    "link_url": "/r/AINativeLawFirms/comments/1wjvoh1/morgan_morgan_is_spending_1_billion_on_ai_what/",
    "virality": "somewhat_high",
    "post_date": "2026-09-18T16:56:05.000Z",
    "post_kind": "crosspost",
    "post_text": "Morgan & Morgan just committed $1 billion to AI and technology over the next decade.\n\nThey have already spent roughly $300 million building their own internal AI platform, MX2, which reportedly has nearly 5,000 monthly users. It is being used for things like medical record extraction, document generation, case search, trial preparation, and agentic workflows.\n\nThe most interesting part to me isn't the $1 billion number.\n\nIt's what this means for everyone else.\n\nMorgan & Morgan can hire engineers and build proprietary AI infrastructure around the way its lawyers actually practice. The average 5, 20, or 50 lawyer firm obviously can't spend hundreds of millions building its own technology.\n\nBut those firms are competing in the same market.\n\nOver the next few years, I think we're going to see a growing divide between firms that simply give their lawyers access to ChatGPT or another AI tool and firms that actually redesign their workflows around AI.\n\nThose are two very different things.\n\nAn AI-native law firm isn't necessarily a firm with its own model or engineering team. It could simply be a firm where intake, research, drafting, document review, knowledge management, client communication, and administrative work have been intentionally rebuilt around AI, while lawyers remain responsible for judgment and final work product.\n\nMorgan & Morgan's bet seems to be that this becomes a...",
    "sentiment": "positive",
    "subreddit": "legaltech",
    "post_flair": [
      "Question / Tech Stack Advice"
    ],
    "post_title": "Morgan & Morgan is spending $1 billion on AI. What happens to the firms that can’t?",
    "prominence": "aside",
    "source_url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1wjvpoy/morgan_morgan_is_spending_1_billion_on_ai_what/",
    "entity_role": "vendor",
    "post_author": "DhowDaddy",
    "upvote_ratio": 0.84,
    "mention_count": 4,
    "mention_surge": true,
    "subreddit_url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/",
    "total_upvotes": 17,
    "comments_total": 34,
    "total_comments": 34,
    "other_companies": [
      {
        "name": "Thomson Reuters",
        "role": "alternative",
        "domain": "thomsonreuters.com"
      }
    ],
    "post_author_url": "https://www.reddit.com/user/DhowDaddy/",
    "signal_category": "feedback",
    "comments_included": 20
  }
}

Long text fields are shortened on this page.

Looking up one signal by its id is free. Enrich costs 2 credits per signal returned; a call with no results is free.