Post
Highlighted: the lines this signal was extracted from
Alright y'all This is how it's gonna work. I'm going to do a ranking of sponsors & their FSPs. Then you guys will tell me your opinions and I'll create a new updated post. Basically, the higher the number the better it is. Roche FSP : absolutely top tier, European founded company with European work culture Amgen FSP : pretty good, just a lot of metrics Teva FSP AbbVie FSP : can be good but workload has gotten higher over the years Merck FSP Bayer FSP BMS FSP AstraZeneca FSP: can overwork you, especially if you work for AZ directly Novartis FSP: can be bureaucratic and systems are clunky J&J FSP: lots of misalignment between teams Novo Nordisk FSP Takeda FSP Regeneron FSP: can overwork you and very political Incyte FSP Biogen FSP Gilead FSP Moderna FSP: a platform without a product Pfizer FSP: Will overwork you and toxic culture Sanofi FSP Eli Lilly FSP: Will overwork you, the least liked FSP Of course, it boils down to your team, LM, and CRO, but this a general ranking from what I’ve read on Reddit.
Also quoted as evidence
[comment u/zorojirou] Working with Pfizer as an FSP is so toxic! My sites always complain about the systems getting changed midway and this has happened in so many studies. The work culture is toxic with the leadership knowing very little about onsite monitoring and how it actually works.